前言:眾所周知,Activity是四大組件之首,網(wǎng)上關(guān)于Activity的博客也有很多,相信大家對于他的生命周期和啟動模式有了相應(yīng)的了解。本文就不再對這些進行講述了,我要從源碼的角度對一個Activity的啟動過程進行分析。
我們知道,當startActivity被調(diào)用的時候,可以啟動一個Activity,但是你知道這個Activity是如何被啟動的嗎?你知道這個Activity是啥時候被創(chuàng)建的嗎?為什么onCreate是Activity的執(zhí)行入口呢?所有的這一切都被系統(tǒng)封裝好了,對我們來說是透明的,我們使用的時候僅僅是傳遞一個intent然后startActivity就可以達到目的了,不用擔心,閱讀了本文以后,你將會了解它的背后到底做了哪些事情。在分析之前,我先介紹幾個類:
Activity:startActivity方法的真正實現(xiàn)在Activity中
Instrumentation:用來輔助Activity完成啟動Activity的過程
ActivityThread(包含ApplicationThread + ApplicationThreadNative + IApplicationThread):真正啟動Activity的實現(xiàn)都在這里
開始源碼分析:Activity#startActivity()
public void startActivity(Intent intent) {
this.startActivity(intent, null);
}
public void startActivity(Intent intent, @Nullable Bundle options) {
if (options != null) {
startActivityForResult(intent, -1, options);
} else {
// Note we want to go through this call for compatibility with
// applications that may have overridden the method.
startActivityForResult(intent, -1);
}
}
public void startActivityForResult(Intent intent, int requestCode) {
startActivityForResult(intent, requestCode, null);
}
從上面的代碼中我們發(fā)現(xiàn):調(diào)用startActivty實際上最后還是調(diào)用了startActivityForResult 方法。那么,我們沿著這個方法繼續(xù)深入探討:
Activity#startActivityForResult
public void startActivityForResult(Intent intent, int requestCode, @Nullable Bundle options) {
if (mParent == null) {
//真正執(zhí)行啟動activity的代碼邏輯
Instrumentation.ActivityResult ar =
mInstrumentation.execStartActivity(
this, mMainThread.getApplicationThread(), mToken, this,
intent, requestCode, options);
//啟動activity返回的結(jié)果處理
if (ar != null) {
mMainThread.sendActivityResult(
mToken, mEmbeddedID, requestCode, ar.getResultCode(),
ar.getResultData());
}
if (requestCode >= 0) {
mStartedActivity = true;
}
cancelInputsAndStartExitTransition(options);
// TODO Consider clearing/flushing other event sources and events for child windows.
} else {
if (options != null) {
mParent.startActivityFromChild(this, intent, requestCode, options);
} else {
// Note we want to go through this method for compatibility with
// existing applications that may have overridden it.
mParent.startActivityFromChild(this, intent, requestCode);
}
}
}
從上面代碼我們發(fā)現(xiàn),實際上調(diào)用的啟動activity方法的還是Instrumentation類。也就是我們第二個要研究的重點類。
Instrumentation#execStartActivity
public ActivityResult execStartActivity(
Context who, IBinder contextThread, IBinder token, Activity target,
Intent intent, int requestCode, Bundle options) {
//這個whoThread執(zhí)行了啟動activity
IApplicationThread whoThread = (IApplicationThread) contextThread;
Uri referrer = target != null ? target.onProvideReferrer() : null;
if (referrer != null) {
intent.putExtra(Intent.EXTRA_REFERRER, referrer);
}
if (mActivityMonitors != null) {
synchronized (mSync) {
final int N = mActivityMonitors.size();
//遍歷一遍,查詢是否存在這個activity,activity類存放在intent中。
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) {
final ActivityMonitor am = mActivityMonitors.get(i);
if (am.match(who, null, intent)) {
am.mHits++;
if (am.isBlocking()) {
return requestCode >= 0 ? am.getResult() : null;
}
break;
}
}
}
}
try {
intent.migrateExtraStreamToClipData();
intent.prepareToLeaveProcess();
//這里通過ActivityManager啟動了activity
int result = ActivityManagerNative.getDefault()
.startActivity(whoThread, who.getBasePackageName(), intent,
intent.resolveTypeIfNeeded(who.getContentResolver()),
token, target != null ? target.mEmbeddedID : null,
requestCode, 0, null, options);
//檢查啟動activity返回的結(jié)果
checkStartActivityResult(result, intent);
} catch (RemoteException e) {
throw new RuntimeException("Failure from system", e);
}
return null;
}
從上面,相關(guān)代碼我都加上了注釋。有兩點:
1:真正執(zhí)行activity的啟動過程的是ActivityManagerNative.getDefault().startActivity。
2:執(zhí)行啟動activity之后,有一個代碼檢查結(jié)果。
我們先看看第2個方法:
Instrumentation#checkStartActivityResult
public static void checkStartActivityResult(int res, Object intent) {
if (res >= ActivityManager.START_SUCCESS) {
return;
}
switch (res) {
case ActivityManager.START_INTENT_NOT_RESOLVED:
case ActivityManager.START_CLASS_NOT_FOUND:
if (intent instanceof Intent && ((Intent) intent).getComponent() != null)
throw new ActivityNotFoundException(
"Unable to find explicit activity class "
+ ((Intent) intent).getComponent().toShortString()
+ "; have you declared this activity in your AndroidManifest.xml?");
throw new ActivityNotFoundException(
"No Activity found to handle " + intent);
case ActivityManager.START_PERMISSION_DENIED:
throw new SecurityException("Not allowed to start activity "
+ intent);
case ActivityManager.START_FORWARD_AND_REQUEST_CONFLICT:
throw new AndroidRuntimeException(
"FORWARD_RESULT_FLAG used while also requesting a result");
case ActivityManager.START_NOT_ACTIVITY:
throw new IllegalArgumentException(
"PendingIntent is not an activity");
case ActivityManager.START_NOT_VOICE_COMPATIBLE:
throw new SecurityException(
"Starting under voice control not allowed for: " + intent);
case ActivityManager.START_NOT_CURRENT_USER_ACTIVITY:
// Fail silently for this case so we don't break current apps.
// TODO(b/22929608): Instead of failing silently or throwing an exception,
// we should properly position the activity in the stack (i.e. behind all current
// user activity/task) and not change the positioning of stacks.
Log.e(TAG,
"Not allowed to start background user activity that shouldn't be displayed"
+ " for all users. Failing silently...");
break;
default:
throw new AndroidRuntimeException("Unknown error code "
+ res + " when starting " + intent);
}
}
有沒有一些熟悉的異常信息呢?比如:如果我們沒有在xml配置文件中注冊activity,那么啟動activity的時候是不是會報Unable to find explicit activity class......。
那么,我們回到第1個問題,真正執(zhí)行的啟動代碼在
ActivityManagerNative.getDefault().startActivity()中:
我們發(fā)現(xiàn):ActivityManagerNative是抽象類,getDefault() 方法返回的是IActivityManager,也僅僅是一個接口而已;那么實際上我們跟蹤代碼會發(fā)現(xiàn)startActivity()也僅僅是IActivityManager的一個方法而已,那么我們是不是到這里就束手無策了呢?
答案當然是否定的。
1:我們找到IApplicationThread的接口截圖:

我們可以發(fā)現(xiàn)很多類似activity生命周期的方法,onCreate,onStart,onResume等等。是不是明白了什么呢?是的,activity的生命周期實際上是在調(diào)用這些方法,但是這只是一個接口,我們需要繼續(xù)找到他的實現(xiàn)類。別急,下面會講到;
2:我們需要找到IActivityManager的實現(xiàn)類。
那么,我們來看看IActivityManager#startActivity()方法:ActivityManagerNative抽象類,這個抽象類使用了代理
class ActivityManagerProxy implements IActivityManager;
//這個代理類實現(xiàn)了IActivityManager的startActivity方法,我們看看:
public int startActivity(IApplicationThread caller, String callingPackage, Intent intent,
String resolvedType, IBinder resultTo, String resultWho, int requestCode,
int startFlags, ProfilerInfo profilerInfo, Bundle options) throws RemoteException {
Parcel data = Parcel.obtain();
Parcel reply = Parcel.obtain();
data.writeInterfaceToken(IActivityManager.descriptor);
data.writeStrongBinder(caller != null ? caller.asBinder() : null);
data.writeString(callingPackage);
intent.writeToParcel(data, 0);
data.writeString(resolvedType);
data.writeStrongBinder(resultTo);
data.writeString(resultWho);
data.writeInt(requestCode);
data.writeInt(startFlags);
if (profilerInfo != null) {
data.writeInt(1);
profilerInfo.writeToParcel(data, Parcelable.PARCELABLE_WRITE_RETURN_VALUE);
} else {
data.writeInt(0);
}
if (options != null) {
data.writeInt(1);
options.writeToParcel(data, 0);
} else {
data.writeInt(0);
}
//上面都是一些數(shù)據(jù)的填寫,這里是智行事務(wù)的邏輯代碼
mRemote.transact(START_ACTIVITY_TRANSACTION, data, reply, 0);
reply.readException();
int result = reply.readInt();
reply.recycle();
data.recycle();
return result;
}
private IBinder mRemote;
我們從代碼發(fā)現(xiàn)了mRemote是一個IBinder,調(diào)用了IBinder的transact()方法,真是IBinder無處不在啊。這說明了啟動Activity實際上也是進行了進程間的通信。是不是又明白了什么?比如A應(yīng)用要啟動B應(yīng)用的某個Activity,怎么做?進程間通信幫你解決。偉大的IBinder,如果你們需要的話,后期我會出一個IBinder機制講解,可以通過源碼分析,因為我個人認為,結(jié)合源碼分析會更加有說服力并使得自己記憶更加牢固。(有這樣需求的請留言讓我看到哦...)
那么mRemote的初始化問題大家應(yīng)該都清楚吧,上面我們調(diào)用了ActivityManagerNative.getDefault(),代碼我就不貼出來了,使用了單利模式,大家可以進去看看。
我們從上面知道了IApplicationThread執(zhí)行了啟動activity,那么誰實現(xiàn)了該接口呢?當然是ApplicationThread,這個類是ActivityThread的內(nèi)部類。里面很多的方法都對應(yīng)了相關(guān)的activity生命周期方法,我們僅僅來看看scheduleLaunchActivity:
public final void scheduleLaunchActivity(Intent intent, IBinder token, int ident,
ActivityInfo info, Configuration curConfig, Configuration overrideConfig,
CompatibilityInfo compatInfo, String referrer, IVoiceInteractor voiceInteractor,
int procState, Bundle state, PersistableBundle persistentState,
List<ResultInfo> pendingResults, List<ReferrerIntent> pendingNewIntents,
boolean notResumed, boolean isForward, ProfilerInfo profilerInfo) {
updateProcessState(procState, false);
ActivityClientRecord r = new ActivityClientRecord();
r.token = token;
r.ident = ident;
r.intent = intent;
r.referrer = referrer;
r.voiceInteractor = voiceInteractor;
r.activityInfo = info;
r.compatInfo = compatInfo;
r.state = state;
r.persistentState = persistentState;
r.pendingResults = pendingResults;
r.pendingIntents = pendingNewIntents;
r.startsNotResumed = notResumed;
r.isForward = isForward;
r.profilerInfo = profilerInfo;
r.overrideConfig = overrideConfig;
updatePendingConfiguration(curConfig);
sendMessage(H.LAUNCH_ACTIVITY, r);
}
我們看到最后的sendMessage,往下走我們找到H類的處理消息方法
public void handleMessage(Message msg) {
if (DEBUG_MESSAGES) Slog.v(TAG, ">>> handling: " + codeToString(msg.what));
switch (msg.what) {
case LAUNCH_ACTIVITY: {
Trace.traceBegin(Trace.TRACE_TAG_ACTIVITY_MANAGER, "activityStart");
final ActivityClientRecord r = (ActivityClientRecord) msg.obj;
r.packageInfo = getPackageInfoNoCheck(
r.activityInfo.applicationInfo, r.compatInfo);
handleLaunchActivity(r, null);
Trace.traceEnd(Trace.TRACE_TAG_ACTIVITY_MANAGER);
} break; ....
代碼沒有全部貼出,僅僅是看看LAUNCH_ACTIVITY 的處理即可。我們可以看到handleLaunchActivity(),沿著這個方法繼續(xù)往下尋找,最后發(fā)現(xiàn)performLaunchActivity
private Activity performLaunchActivity(ActivityClientRecord r, Intent customIntent) {
ActivityInfo aInfo = r.activityInfo;
ComponentName component = r.intent.getComponent();
Activity activity = null;
try {
java.lang.ClassLoader cl = r.packageInfo.getClassLoader();
activity = mInstrumentation.newActivity(
cl, component.getClassName(), r.intent);
StrictMode.incrementExpectedActivityCount(activity.getClass());
r.intent.setExtrasClassLoader(cl);
r.intent.prepareToEnterProcess();
if (r.state != null) {
r.state.setClassLoader(cl);
}
} catch (Exception e) {
if (!mInstrumentation.onException(activity, e)) {
throw new RuntimeException(
"Unable to instantiate activity " + component
+ ": " + e.toString(), e);
}
}
......
return activity;
}
最后的邏輯都在這里,通過我們的intent數(shù)據(jù),結(jié)合classLoader找到了相關(guān)的類并且加載進來了。詳細的邏輯在這里就不講太多了。
其實我們了解看源代碼并不需要了解各種細節(jié),只是需要了解他的框架即可。如果你深入了解了細節(jié),恐怕會發(fā)生鉆牛角尖的情況。這樣對于整體的把握可能會不好。當然,如果你是做ROM開發(fā)或者個人已經(jīng)掌握了Android源碼框架,深入研究未嘗不可。