Yesterday night I stayed up late because I was fascinated by Joseph Epstein’s article entitled “who killed poetry?” Everyone agrees that poetry is in a bad way but as to why none has a convincing and conclusive idea. Joseph Epstein at the outset is also just quoting the opinions of some famous people. For example some say that poetry suffered a decline because of the modernist movement spearheaded by T.S. Eliot and his cohorts.They pushed poetry toward the colloquial, the slangy and the difficult. However, the retort is equally resounding: after the difficult phase, the numbers of the readers didn’t pick up at all. Then there is Shapiro’s interesting “B”, “S”,” K”theory; that is, in any given period, there are only three great poets like Byron, Shelley and Keats and the others are just satellites moving in their orbits. This, to me, doesn’t seem to explain much. At last comes Joseph Epstein’s own theory in the disguise of a quote by a French poet. The gist of it is that nowadays poets are highly professionalized; they work in universities as professors and run their own workshops and move in their coterie circles. In consequence, they tend to pay compliments to each other and wouldn't dole out any criticisms whatever. The result is a suffocating atmosphere, without hope, without new vitality. Epstein's article ends on a neither-happy-nor-sad note and sounds a warning couched in figurative language.
Random Thoughts on Reading Poetry
最后編輯于 :
?著作權歸作者所有,轉載或內(nèi)容合作請聯(lián)系作者
【社區(qū)內(nèi)容提示】社區(qū)部分內(nèi)容疑似由AI輔助生成,瀏覽時請結合常識與多方信息審慎甄別。
平臺聲明:文章內(nèi)容(如有圖片或視頻亦包括在內(nèi))由作者上傳并發(fā)布,文章內(nèi)容僅代表作者本人觀點,簡書系信息發(fā)布平臺,僅提供信息存儲服務。
【社區(qū)內(nèi)容提示】社區(qū)部分內(nèi)容疑似由AI輔助生成,瀏覽時請結合常識與多方信息審慎甄別。
平臺聲明:文章內(nèi)容(如有圖片或視頻亦包括在內(nèi))由作者上傳并發(fā)布,文章內(nèi)容僅代表作者本人觀點,簡書系信息發(fā)布平臺,僅提供信息存儲服務。
相關閱讀更多精彩內(nèi)容
- (達達令的新書,我拍的) 雞血不過是前人根據(jù)自己的經(jīng)驗總結出來的,是否適用于你,我就不知道了。 沒有相同的人生,沒...