優(yōu)化參考
查詢優(yōu)化問題,需要有大量的數(shù)據(jù)來支持,我們通過java插入了500W條數(shù)據(jù)到數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)中,數(shù)據(jù)結(jié)構(gòu)如下所示
{
"_id" : ObjectId("5a3b28b8b932f02bc038744d"),
"type" : "fatal",
"date" : ISODate("2000-07-19T13:03:25.207Z"),
"ip" : "111.176.23.100",
"operator" : "error",
"user" : "asd"
}
我們要進(jìn)行查詢優(yōu)化,首先需要一些參考依據(jù),當(dāng)我們完成如下查詢
db.logs.find({type:"fatal"}).sort({date:-1}).limit(1)
查詢時(shí)間為6m,當(dāng)查詢時(shí)間超過100ms,這個(gè)查詢就會(huì)在日志系統(tǒng)中有所記錄
2017-12-21T17:59:17.409+0800 I COMMAND [conn95] command demo.logs appName: "MongoDB Shell" command: find { find: "logs", filter: { type: "fatal" }, limit: 1.0, singleBatch: false, sort: { date: -1.0 } } planSummary: COLLSCAN keysExamined:0 docsExamined:5000000 hasSortStage:1 cursorExhausted:1 numYields:39176 nreturned:1 reslen:194 locks:{ Global: { acquireCount: { r: 78354 } }, Database: { acquireCount: { r: 39177 } }, Collection: { acquireCount: { r: 39177 } } } protocol:op_command 6552ms
這個(gè)信息是我們排查查詢效率的一個(gè)非常好的途徑,通過這個(gè)信息我們首先看到{find:"logs",filter:{type:"fatal"}} 這里指明了查詢的collection,通過type來查詢,并且limit了1條和通過Date排序,通過這個(gè)信息我們可以定位到我們具體的查詢中,后面的信息,我們會(huì)在explain中詳細(xì)講解。
日志是第一種慢查詢的分析手段,我們的第二種手段是使用PROFILER查詢分析器,PROFILER查詢分析器默認(rèn)是關(guān)閉的使用setProfilingLevel 可以開啟查詢分析器。
db.setProfilingLevel(2)表示開啟查詢分析器,級(jí)別為2級(jí),會(huì)詳細(xì)的記錄每個(gè)讀寫操作
db.setProfilingLevel(1,50)表示設(shè)置監(jiān)控級(jí)別為1級(jí),并且當(dāng)查詢時(shí)間超過50ms就會(huì)啟動(dòng)監(jiān)控
db.setProfilingLevel(0)表示關(guān)閉監(jiān)控級(jí)別
當(dāng)開啟了2級(jí)查詢之后,默認(rèn)會(huì)監(jiān)聽100ms已上的查詢,當(dāng)使用了以下查詢之后
db.logs.find({type:"fatal"}).sort({ip:-1}).limit(1)
查詢時(shí)間超過了7秒,所有的監(jiān)控結(jié)果會(huì)保存在一個(gè)特殊的集合中,可以通過system.profile來進(jìn)行查詢,這個(gè)集合的大小是固定的,在3.0版本后分配了128k的空間,當(dāng)超過這個(gè)大小會(huì)覆蓋掉原來的信息,目前由于只有一條信息,我們可以通過findOne來進(jìn)行查詢
>db.system.profile.findOne({})
{
"op" : "query",
"ns" : "demo.logs",
"query" : {
"find" : "logs",
"filter" : {
"type" : "fatal"
},
"limit" : 1.0,
"singleBatch" : false,
"sort" : {
"ip" : -1.0
}
},
"keysExamined" : 0,
"docsExamined" : 5000000,
"hasSortStage" : true,
"cursorExhausted" : true,
"numYield" : 39169,
"locks" : {
"Global" : {
"acquireCount" : {
"r" : NumberLong(78340)
}
},
"Database" : {
"acquireCount" : {
"r" : NumberLong(39170)
}
},
"Collection" : {
"acquireCount" : {
"r" : NumberLong(39170)
}
}
},
"nreturned" : 1,
"responseLength" : 191,
"protocol" : "op_command",
"millis" : 7010,
"planSummary" : "COLLSCAN",
"execStats" : {
"stage" : "SORT",
"nReturned" : 1,
"executionTimeMillisEstimate" : 6386,
"works" : 5000005,
"advanced" : 1,
"needTime" : 5000003,
"needYield" : 0,
"saveState" : 39169,
"restoreState" : 39169,
"isEOF" : 1,
"invalidates" : 0,
"sortPattern" : {
"ip" : -1.0
},
"memUsage" : 114,
"memLimit" : 33554432,
"limitAmount" : 1,
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "SORT_KEY_GENERATOR",
"nReturned" : 1000696,
"executionTimeMillisEstimate" : 5824,
"works" : 5000003,
"advanced" : 1000696,
"needTime" : 3999306,
"needYield" : 0,
"saveState" : 39169,
"restoreState" : 39169,
"isEOF" : 1,
"invalidates" : 0,
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "COLLSCAN",
"filter" : {
"type" : {
"$eq" : "fatal"
}
},
"nReturned" : 1000696,
"executionTimeMillisEstimate" : 4380,
"works" : 5000002,
"advanced" : 1000696,
"needTime" : 3999305,
"needYield" : 0,
"saveState" : 39169,
"restoreState" : 39169,
"isEOF" : 1,
"invalidates" : 0,
"direction" : "forward",
"docsExamined" : 5000000
}
}
},
"ts" : ISODate("2017-12-21T23:59:36.779Z"),
"client" : "127.0.0.1",
"appName" : "MongoDB Shell",
"allUsers" : [],
"user" : ""
}
這是非常有用的分析性能的文檔,前面幾個(gè)字段說明了,查詢的基本信息,后面就是一些查詢的分析信息,需要注意的是監(jiān)控策略開啟之后會(huì)自動(dòng)監(jiān)控所有的讀操作和寫操作,所以策略時(shí)間建議有一個(gè)漸進(jìn),如先開啟100ms,然后慢慢過渡到90ms,不要一次性減少的間隔過大,這樣有可能會(huì)找不到你想要的信息。解決慢查詢最佳的時(shí)間應(yīng)該是在集成測(cè)試階段,如果在實(shí)際的運(yùn)行環(huán)境中檢測(cè),發(fā)現(xiàn)問題和解決問題的成本會(huì)比較高,但在實(shí)際情況看,更多的問題都是在項(xiàng)目運(yùn)行過程之中才會(huì)體現(xiàn)。另外需要注明的是system.profile里面內(nèi)容存儲(chǔ)得比較多的時(shí)候,會(huì)通過$natural進(jìn)行自然排序,我們可以通過sort來獲取最后的數(shù)據(jù)
db.system.profile.find().sort({$natural:-1})
已上介紹了發(fā)現(xiàn)慢查詢的方法,發(fā)現(xiàn)很簡(jiǎn)單,但要處理就需要根據(jù)實(shí)際情況來考慮,出現(xiàn)慢查詢的原因很多,有一部分是設(shè)計(jì)問題,一部分是硬件問題,還一部分是索引問題,我們首選的解決方案就是添加索引,通過合理的索引設(shè)置來解決部分問題。已上內(nèi)容目前并沒有詳細(xì)的解釋,請(qǐng)大家看完下一小節(jié)的內(nèi)容再回過頭來看看,這個(gè)信息,是不是就一目了然了。
explain()的運(yùn)用
通過查詢分析器和日志,可以檢測(cè)到慢查詢,這些在實(shí)際的項(xiàng)目運(yùn)行中比較有效,但是在索引設(shè)計(jì)時(shí),使用這種方式效率就比較低,MongoDB提供了explain()函數(shù)來找到原因。注意MongoDB2和3之后的explain的文檔結(jié)構(gòu)有很大區(qū)別,文中主要以3.4為例,使用如下查詢
db.logs.find({type:"error"}).sort({data:-1}).limit(1).explain("executionStats")
在explain中加入executionStats之后可以根據(jù)運(yùn)行的結(jié)果生成統(tǒng)計(jì),先看看查詢出來的結(jié)果
{
"queryPlanner" : {
"plannerVersion" : 1,
"namespace" : "demo.logs",
"indexFilterSet" : false,
"parsedQuery" : {
"type" : {
"$eq" : "error"
}
},
"winningPlan" : {
"stage" : "SORT",
"sortPattern" : {
"data" : -1.0
},
"limitAmount" : 1,
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "SORT_KEY_GENERATOR",
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "COLLSCAN",
"filter" : {
"type" : {
"$eq" : "error"
}
},
"direction" : "forward"
}
}
},
"rejectedPlans" : []
},
"executionStats" : {
"executionSuccess" : true,
"nReturned" : 1,
"executionTimeMillis" : 5698,
"totalKeysExamined" : 0,
"totalDocsExamined" : 5000000,
"executionStages" : {
"stage" : "SORT",
"nReturned" : 1,
"executionTimeMillisEstimate" : 5189,
"works" : 5000005,
"advanced" : 1,
"needTime" : 5000003,
"needYield" : 0,
"saveState" : 39157,
"restoreState" : 39157,
"isEOF" : 1,
"invalidates" : 0,
"sortPattern" : {
"data" : -1.0
},
"memUsage" : 122,
"memLimit" : 33554432,
"limitAmount" : 1,
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "SORT_KEY_GENERATOR",
"nReturned" : 1000421,
"executionTimeMillisEstimate" : 4728,
"works" : 5000003,
"advanced" : 1000421,
"needTime" : 3999581,
"needYield" : 0,
"saveState" : 39157,
"restoreState" : 39157,
"isEOF" : 1,
"invalidates" : 0,
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "COLLSCAN",
"filter" : {
"type" : {
"$eq" : "error"
}
},
"nReturned" : 1000421,
"executionTimeMillisEstimate" : 3048,
"works" : 5000002,
"advanced" : 1000421,
"needTime" : 3999580,
"needYield" : 0,
"saveState" : 39157,
"restoreState" : 39157,
"isEOF" : 1,
"invalidates" : 0,
"direction" : "forward",
"docsExamined" : 5000000
}
}
}
},
"serverInfo" : {
"host" : "SD-201709290948",
"port" : 27017,
"version" : "3.4.10-22-gb6132d8",
"gitVersion" : "b6132d87fe4c108dfb0c94980a49d97406b42dce"
},
"ok" : 1.0
}
首先queryPlan表示查詢的基本信息,這個(gè)里面除了顯示查詢的基本操作外,有一個(gè)是值得大家注意的,那就是winning.Plans 中的stage,這里顯示的SORT,說明是文檔排序,這是嚴(yán)重影響效率的排序,馬上就會(huì)詳細(xì)介紹。
接下來關(guān)注executionStats中的內(nèi)容,這個(gè)內(nèi)容非常重要,個(gè)人先篩選如下幾個(gè)重要的信息出來,我們需要慢慢來分析
"executionStats" : {
"executionSuccess" : true,
"nReturned" : 1, ##實(shí)際獲取的文檔數(shù)
"executionTimeMillis" : 5104, ##查詢時(shí)間
"totalKeysExamined" : 0, ##掃描的索引總數(shù)
"totalDocsExamined" : 5000000,##掃描的總文檔數(shù)
.....
},
通過已上信息,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)實(shí)際只獲取了一個(gè)文檔,但卻花費(fèi)了5秒的時(shí)間,并且沒有去掃描索引,但文檔卻掃描了500W條,因?yàn)槲覀兗尤肓伺判?,它?huì)把所有文檔讀取到內(nèi)存然后倒序得到最后一個(gè)結(jié)果,此時(shí),我們不進(jìn)行排序,看看結(jié)果
>db.logs.find({type:"error"}).limit(1).explain("executionStats")
"executionStats" : {
"executionSuccess" : true,
"nReturned" : 1,
"executionTimeMillis" : 0,
"totalKeysExamined" : 0,
"totalDocsExamined" : 4,##沒有排序,僅僅掃描了4個(gè)文檔
...
}
此時(shí)我們發(fā)現(xiàn)totalDocsExamined為4,由于查詢的是type為error的信息,當(dāng)從頭掃描,當(dāng)掃描到第4個(gè)文檔的時(shí)候就發(fā)現(xiàn)了,然后就返回了,當(dāng)然也沒有執(zhí)行索引。所以totalDocsExamined和nReturned是非常具有價(jià)值的兩個(gè)數(shù)據(jù),如果這兩個(gè)懸殊太大肯定就是查詢有問題,我們期望這兩值越接近越好,說明檢索的東西就是我們想要的內(nèi)容
下面來分析executionStages中的信息,首先看原始查詢的
"executionStages" : {
"stage" : "SORT",##這個(gè)非常重要
"nReturned" : 1,
"executionTimeMillisEstimate" : 5366,
....
}
stage是非常重要的一個(gè)信息,幾種類型,SORT表示文檔排序,這是我們比較害怕的操作,因?yàn)樗鼪]有進(jìn)行索引,而是對(duì)文檔進(jìn)行排序,(就等于我們要讀一本書,我們順著內(nèi)容去找內(nèi)容而不是通過目錄找信息),我們還會(huì)看到另外一個(gè)值COLLSCAN,這也是非常影響效率的操作,因?yàn)樗鼘儆谌頀呙?。下面我們?cè)倏匆粋€(gè)操作
> db.logs.find({type:"error"}).skip(50000).limit(1).explain("executionStats")
"executionStats" : {
"executionSuccess" : true,
"nReturned" : 1,
"executionTimeMillis" : 129,
"totalKeysExamined" : 0,
"totalDocsExamined" : 249186,
...
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "SKIP",
"nReturned" : 1,
"executionTimeMillisEstimate" : 103,
"works" : 249187,
....
此處我們沒有排序,而是skip了50000條文檔,雖然只查一條數(shù)據(jù),但是卻在文檔中掃描了24w的數(shù)據(jù),掃描這么多數(shù)據(jù)都是在SKIP操作上發(fā)生的,所以skip其實(shí)會(huì)做全表掃描。效率極不理想。所以stage我們一般都不希望出現(xiàn)“SORT”、“COLLSCAN”和不理想的“SKIP”。下面我們通過_id 進(jìn)行一下檢索,默認(rèn)_id 都會(huì)加上唯一索引,看看結(jié)果
> db.logs.find({type:"error"}).sort({_id:-1}).limit(1).explain("executionStats")
/* 1 */
{
"queryPlanner" : {
"plannerVersion" : 1,
"namespace" : "demo.logs",
"indexFilterSet" : false,
"parsedQuery" : {
"type" : {
"$eq" : "error"
}
},
"winningPlan" : {
...
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "IXSCAN", ##sort是基于索引的查詢
"keyPattern" : {
"_id" : 1
},
"indexName" : "_id_", ##索引的名稱,基于主鍵的查詢
"isMultiKey" : false,
"multiKeyPaths" : {
"_id" : []
},
"isUnique" : true, ##唯一索引
"isSparse" : false, ##不是稀疏索引
....
}
}
}
},
"rejectedPlans" : []
},
"executionStats" : {
"executionSuccess" : true,
"nReturned" : 1, ##返回一個(gè)文檔
"executionTimeMillis" : 2, ##花費(fèi)了2毫秒
"totalKeysExamined" : 5, ##檢索了5個(gè)索引
"totalDocsExamined" : 5, ##檢索了5篇document
"executionStages" : {
。。。。
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "FETCH", ##通過索引進(jìn)行抓取
"filter" : {
"type" : {
"$eq" : "error"
}
},
"nReturned" : 1,
"executionTimeMillisEstimate" : 0,
"works" : 5,
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "IXSCAN", ##索引檢索
"nReturned" : 5,
....
}
}
}
},
}
這次查詢雖然查詢的字段沒有增加索引,但排序時(shí)已經(jīng)通過索引。所以僅僅檢索了5個(gè)文檔就得到了結(jié)果,效率從7秒減少到了2毫秒,大家看到檢索的優(yōu)勢(shì)了吧。
下面我們?yōu)閐ate增加索引,看看效果
> db.logs.createIndex({date:1})
> db.logs.find({type:"error"}).sort({date:-1}).limit(15).explain("executionStats")
{
"queryPlanner" : {
"plannerVersion" : 1,
"namespace" : "demo.logs",
"indexFilterSet" : false,
"parsedQuery" : {
"type" : {
"$eq" : "error"
}
},
"winningPlan" : {
"stage" : "LIMIT",
"limitAmount" : 15,
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "FETCH",
"filter" : {
"type" : {
"$eq" : "error"
}
},
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "IXSCAN",
"keyPattern" : {
"date" : 1.0
},
"indexName" : "date_1",
"isMultiKey" : false,
"multiKeyPaths" : {
"date" : []
},
"isUnique" : false,
"isSparse" : false,
"isPartial" : false,
"indexVersion" : 2,
"direction" : "backward",
"indexBounds" : {
"date" : [
"[MaxKey, MinKey]"
]
}
}
}
},
"rejectedPlans" : [
{
"stage" : "SORT",
"sortPattern" : {
"date" : -1.0
},
"limitAmount" : 15,
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "SORT_KEY_GENERATOR",
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "FETCH",
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "IXSCAN",
"keyPattern" : {
"type" : 1.0
},
"indexName" : "type_1",
"isMultiKey" : false,
"multiKeyPaths" : {
"type" : []
},
"isUnique" : false,
"isSparse" : false,
"isPartial" : false,
"indexVersion" : 2,
"direction" : "forward",
"indexBounds" : {
"type" : [
"[\"error\", \"error\"]"
]
}
}
}
}
}
]
},
"executionStats" : {
"executionSuccess" : true,
"nReturned" : 15,
"executionTimeMillis" : 34,
"totalKeysExamined" : 68,
"totalDocsExamined" : 68,
"executionStages" : {
"stage" : "LIMIT",
"nReturned" : 15,
"executionTimeMillisEstimate" : 11,
"works" : 69,
"advanced" : 15,
"needTime" : 53,
"needYield" : 0,
"saveState" : 2,
"restoreState" : 2,
"isEOF" : 1,
"invalidates" : 0,
"limitAmount" : 15,
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "FETCH",
"filter" : {
"type" : {
"$eq" : "error"
}
},
"nReturned" : 15,
"executionTimeMillisEstimate" : 11,
"works" : 68,
"advanced" : 15,
"needTime" : 53,
"needYield" : 0,
"saveState" : 2,
"restoreState" : 2,
"isEOF" : 0,
"invalidates" : 0,
"docsExamined" : 68,
"alreadyHasObj" : 0,
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "IXSCAN",
"nReturned" : 68,
"executionTimeMillisEstimate" : 0,
"works" : 68,
"advanced" : 68,
"needTime" : 0,
"needYield" : 0,
"saveState" : 2,
"restoreState" : 2,
"isEOF" : 0,
"invalidates" : 0,
"keyPattern" : {
"date" : 1.0
},
"indexName" : "date_1",
"isMultiKey" : false,
"multiKeyPaths" : {
"date" : []
},
"isUnique" : false,
"isSparse" : false,
"isPartial" : false,
"indexVersion" : 2,
"direction" : "backward",
"indexBounds" : {
"date" : [
"[MaxKey, MinKey]"
]
},
"keysExamined" : 68,
"seeks" : 1,
"dupsTested" : 0,
"dupsDropped" : 0,
"seenInvalidated" : 0
}
}
}
},
"serverInfo" : {
"host" : "SD-201709290948",
"port" : 27017,
"version" : "3.4.10-22-gb6132d8",
"gitVersion" : "b6132d87fe4c108dfb0c94980a49d97406b42dce"
},
"ok" : 1.0
}
這個(gè)結(jié)果和_id 排序類似,效率提高了很多。
下面我們來看skip,在剛才的演示結(jié)果是,使用skip會(huì)在文檔中檢索,效率接近130ms,現(xiàn)在我們?yōu)閠ype增加索引看看效果。
>db.logs.createIndex({type:1})
>db.logs.find({type:"error"}).skip(50000).limit(10).explain("executionStats")
{
"queryPlanner" : {
...
"winningPlan" : {
"stage" : "LIMIT",
"limitAmount" : 15,
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "FETCH", ##查詢都是基于FETCH和索引的
"filter" : {
"type" : {
"$eq" : "error"
}
},
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "IXSCAN",
"keyPattern" : {
"date" : 1.0
},
"indexName" : "date_1",
...
}
}
}
},
"rejectedPlans" : [ ##其他可能的查詢計(jì)劃,但是被MongoDB否決的。
{
"stage" : "SORT",
"sortPattern" : {
"date" : -1.0
},
"limitAmount" : 15,
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "SORT_KEY_GENERATOR",
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "FETCH",
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "IXSCAN",
"keyPattern" : {
"type" : 1.0
},
"indexName" : "type_1",
....
},
"executionStats" : {
"executionSuccess" : true,
"nReturned" : 15, ##返回15條
"executionTimeMillis" : 0, ##時(shí)間接近0ms
"totalKeysExamined" : 68, ##從索引里面查詢
"totalDocsExamined" : 68,
...
}
}
}
}
這個(gè)里面我們看到了rejectedPlans這個(gè)值,這表示MongoDB的查詢優(yōu)化器找到了兩種方案,一種是基于date的方案,但發(fā)現(xiàn)基于type的效率要高一些,所以基于sort的方案就放到了rejectedPlans中了。最后我們發(fā)現(xiàn)檢索了68個(gè)文檔,返回了15條記錄,效率接近0ms。此時(shí)如果我們?yōu)閠ype和date添加一個(gè)復(fù)合索引
>db.logs.createIndex({type:1,date:1})
>db.logs.find({type:"error"}).sort({date:-1}).limit(15).explain("executionStats")
{
"queryPlanner" : {
...
"winningPlan" : {
"stage" : "LIMIT",
"limitAmount" : 15,
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "FETCH",
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "IXSCAN",
"keyPattern" : {
"type" : 1.0,
"date" : 1.0
},
"indexName" : "type_1_date_1",
....
},
...
},
"executionStats" : {
"executionSuccess" : true,
"nReturned" : 15, ##返利15條信息
"executionTimeMillis" : 0,
"totalKeysExamined" : 15,
"totalDocsExamined" : 15, ##查找了15條信息
.....
},
...
"ok" : 1.0
}
這次得到的結(jié)果就更加了理想了,此時(shí)就可以把type的單鍵索引刪除了,因?yàn)橐呀?jīng)沒有意義,通過這個(gè)復(fù)合索引就可以獲取同樣的值。
> db.logs.dropIndex({type:1})
> db.logs.getIndexes()
下面我們把所有復(fù)合索引刪除,并且為type,date,operator分別創(chuàng)建三個(gè)單獨(dú)索引
> db.logs.dropIndex("type_1")
> db.logs.dropIndex("type_1_data_1")
> db.logs.dropIndex("operator_1")
> db.logs.createIndex({type:1})
> db.logs.createIndex({date:1})
> db.logs.createIndex({operator:1})
下面我們運(yùn)行如下查詢
db.logs.find({type:"error",date:{$gt:new Date("2010-01-01")}}).explain(true)
通過explain(true)可以查詢所有的計(jì)劃
{
"queryPlanner" : {
"plannerVersion" : 1,
"namespace" : "demo.logs",
"indexFilterSet" : false,
"parsedQuery" : {
"$and" : [
{
"type" : {
"$eq" : "error"
}
},
{
"date" : {
"$gt" : ISODate("2010-01-01T00:00:00.000Z")
}
}
]
},
"winningPlan" : {
"stage" : "FETCH",
"filter" : {
"date" : {
"$gt" : ISODate("2010-01-01T00:00:00.000Z")
}
},
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "IXSCAN",
"keyPattern" : {
"type" : 1.0
},
"indexName" : "type_1",
"isMultiKey" : false,
"multiKeyPaths" : {
"type" : []
},
"isUnique" : false,
"isSparse" : false,
"isPartial" : false,
"indexVersion" : 2,
"direction" : "forward",
"indexBounds" : {
"type" : [
"[\"error\", \"error\"]"
]
}
}
},
"rejectedPlans" : [
{
"stage" : "FETCH",
"filter" : {
"type" : {
"$eq" : "error"
}
},
"inputStage" : {
"stage" : "IXSCAN",
"keyPattern" : {
"date" : 1.0
},
"indexName" : "date_1",
"isMultiKey" : false,
"multiKeyPaths" : {
"date" : []
},
"isUnique" : false,
"isSparse" : false,
"isPartial" : false,
"indexVersion" : 2,
"direction" : "forward",
"indexBounds" : {
"date" : [
"(new Date(1262304000000), new Date(9223372036854775807)]"
]
}
}
}
]
},
"executionStats" : {
"executionSuccess" : true,
"nReturned" : 399346,
"executionTimeMillis" : 1675,
"totalKeysExamined" : 1000421,
"totalDocsExamined" : 1000421,
...
},
"allPlansExecution" : [
....
]
},
"serverInfo" : {
...
},
"ok" : 1.0
}
我們看到winningPlan是基于type的,而rejectedPlan是基于deat的,為什么會(huì)選擇date而不是type呢?我們可以通過hint函數(shù)來指定執(zhí)行的索引,這種查詢totalDocsExamined為100W條數(shù)據(jù),返回了39W多的數(shù)據(jù),下面我們通過hint指定使用date
> var query = {type:"error",date:{$gt:new Date("2010-01-01")}}
> db.logs.find(query).hint({date:1}).explain(true)
"executionStats" : {
"executionSuccess" : true,
"nReturned" : 399346,
"executionTimeMillis" : 6506,
"totalKeysExamined" : 1995711,
"totalDocsExamined" : 1995711,
發(fā)現(xiàn)查詢了190W才找到這些數(shù)據(jù),所以查詢優(yōu)化器就會(huì)選擇第一種方案,hint方法可以指定使用的索引,大家可以試一下hint({$natural:1}) 這個(gè)表示使用自然搜索,而不使用索引。
到這里索引的內(nèi)容就基本講完了,這里僅僅提供了一個(gè)思路,很多情況需要實(shí)際問題,實(shí)際分析,現(xiàn)在大家再折回頭去看看日志和profile分析器中的內(nèi)容,應(yīng)該就有一定的思路了!