Pinnacle 21檢測(cè)出的ADaM issue如何解釋?zhuān)?/h2>

在臨床試驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)分析中,生成SDTM、ADaM的Define之后,我們會(huì)用Pinnacle 21軟件進(jìn)行檢測(cè)其是否符合CDSIC的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。對(duì)于軟件生成的issue (ERROR, WARNING),我們要進(jìn)行解釋, 對(duì)于ADaM,通常解釋附在提交Analysis Data Reviewer’s Guide文件中(adrg.pdf)。文件中的Issue Summary會(huì)對(duì)Pinnacle 21檢測(cè)出的問(wèn)題一一解釋。下面我來(lái)分享下一些,常見(jiàn)Issue的解釋說(shuō)明:

??Source?? Finding Explanation
Define Unknown NCI Code value for Codelist 'DATEFL' False positive due to a known issue in Pinnacle 21 Community v2.1.1
ADAB, ADAU, ADBMDXA, ADBMHMR, ADBMMCT, ADBMXCT, ADBPI, ADEQ5D, ADLAD, ADLB, ADLBHY, ADMI, ADOPAQ, ADOR, ADSL, ADVS, ADWOMAC Variable label mismatch between dataset and ADaM standard Company doen't change Variable label, and only add descriptive wording as the general label from the ADaM IG are too high-level to be meaningful in our study. For e.g. we defined ADAB.ANL01FL as "Analysis Record Flag in Visit Window"; ADAB.ANL06FL as "Last Post Baseline in 1st. Anal Interval" to provide clear and informative analysis results metadata about the records used for an analysis. Here are the variables Company add descriptive information into variable label: ANLxxFL, CHGCAT1, CRIT1FL, and PARCAT1
ADAB, ADADJCV, ADAECX, ADAEFX, ADAU, ADBLHR, ADBMDXA, ADBMHMR, ADBMMCT, ADBMXCT, ADBPI, ADCM, ADDV, ADEQ5D, ADEX, ADEXSUM, ADFXSUM, ADLAD, ADLB, ADLBHY, ADMH, ADMI, ADOPAQ, ADOR, ADPC, ADSRMPP, ADTTEE, ADTTES, ADVFXR, ADVS, ADWOMAC Required variable is not present Based on the draft ADaM IG version 1.1 and official CDISC training, we did not create TRTP as it was not an appropriate treatment variable for analysis. Another ADSL treatment variable is used instead.
ADBLHR, ADCM, ADDV, ADEX, ADMH, ADPC Required variable is not present The variables PARAM and PARAMCD are not expected since these datasets are not constructed to use the BDS structure.
ADPC *TM is not a numeric variable The variable is PCELTM and comes from SDTM PC domain. It follows the ISO8601 format and in character format.
ADADJCV, ADAECX, ADAEFX, ADBLHR, ADCM, ADDV, ADEX, ADMH Neither AVAL nor AVALC are present in dataset The data didn’t use BDS structure, so AVAL or AVALC is not available.
ADLBHY Inconsistent value for AVALCAT1 This is Company standard and acceptable.
ADBPI Calculation issue: BASE = 0 but PCHG is populated If BASE=0 and AVAL is not missing, then PCHG is equal to ((AVAL-0.5)/0.5)*100 and so populated.
ADAE AEACN value not found in 'Action Taken with Study Treatment' non-extensible codelist ‘DOSE ALTERED OR WITHHELD’ is the Company defined value and acceptable.
ADAB, ADADJCV, ADAE, ADAECX, ADAEFX, ADBLHR, ADBMDXA, ADBPI, ADCM, ADDV, ADEQ5D, ADEX, ADEXSUM, ADFXSUM, ADLAD, ADLB, ADLBHY, ADMH, ADOPAQ, ADOR, ADSL, ADSRMPP, ADTTEE, ADTTES, ADVFXR, ADVS Value for RACE not found in (RACE) user-defined codelist ‘MULTIPLE’ is Company define value and acceptable.
ADSL TRTEDT != Maximum TRxxEDT on this record Alendronate treatment start and end dates have partial dates. Character date TRTEDTC=Maximum TRxxEDTC on this record.
ADLB DTYPE value not found in 'Derivation Type' extensible codelist ‘BQL’ and ‘SDTM-AVERAGE’ are Company define value and acceptable.
最后編輯于
?著作權(quán)歸作者所有,轉(zhuǎn)載或內(nèi)容合作請(qǐng)聯(lián)系作者
【社區(qū)內(nèi)容提示】社區(qū)部分內(nèi)容疑似由AI輔助生成,瀏覽時(shí)請(qǐng)結(jié)合常識(shí)與多方信息審慎甄別。
平臺(tái)聲明:文章內(nèi)容(如有圖片或視頻亦包括在內(nèi))由作者上傳并發(fā)布,文章內(nèi)容僅代表作者本人觀點(diǎn),簡(jiǎn)書(shū)系信息發(fā)布平臺(tái),僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)服務(wù)。

友情鏈接更多精彩內(nèi)容