下午最容易打瞌睡，所以在開始今天的論題前，分享幾則與比爾?蓋茨有關(guān)的笑話給大家，振奮下精神！

笑話一：論怎樣可以娶到比爾?蓋茨的女兒？

爹對兒子說，我想給你找個媳婦。

兒子說，可我愿意自己找！

爹說，但這個女孩子是比爾?蓋茨的女兒！

兒子說，要是這樣，可以。

然后他爹找到比爾?蓋茨，說，我給你女兒找了一個老公。

比爾?蓋茨說，不行，我女兒還??！

爹說，可是這個小伙子是世界銀行的副總裁！

比爾?蓋茨說，啊，這樣，行！

最后，爹找到了世界銀行的總裁，說，我給你推薦一個副總裁！

總裁說，可是我有太多副總裁了，多余了！

爹說，可是這個小伙子是比爾?蓋茨的女婿！

總裁說，這樣呀，行。

結(jié)尾語：世間許多生意就是這樣談成的。

笑話二：假如比爾?蓋茨來中國找工作……

某日，比爾?蓋茨來中國找工作，招聘人員問他：“你會用打印機傳真機么？會掃地洗廁所么？”

蓋茨：“不會，但我會編程 ?！?/p>

招聘員：“連這么簡單的活你都不會，還敢大言不慚會編程？我還不如花800元請個文盲?！?/p>

第二天，蓋茨再來求職：“我已經(jīng)學(xué)會了使用打印機傳真機、掃地洗廁所?！?/p>

招聘人員問他：“研究生學(xué)歷工資5000元，本科生3000元，你是什么學(xué)歷？”

蓋茨：“我大學(xué)輟學(xué)，可是我會編程。”

招聘員：“那就是高中文憑啦，我們要求最低學(xué)歷是本科?！?/p>

第三天，蓋茨再來求職：“哈佛大學(xué)已經(jīng)同意頒發(fā)榮譽博士學(xué)位給我了。”

招聘員問：“什么哈佛？沒聽過！哈爾濱佛學(xué)院么？我們要求的是國內(nèi)名牌大學(xué)的畢業(yè)生?！?/p>

第四天，蓋茨：“中國清華大學(xué)已經(jīng)同意頒發(fā)榮譽博士學(xué)位給我了?！?/p>

招聘員：“你會說至少兩門語言嗎？”

蓋茨：……

笑話三：我有錢我任性

比爾?蓋茨：“我昨天去銀行談貸款的事?！?/p>

喬布斯：“你要貸款干嘛？”

比爾?蓋茨：“不是我要，是銀行要?！?/p>

（兩人看著對方淫笑……）

娛樂的part已結(jié)束，現(xiàn)在回歸今天的主題，提到比爾?蓋茨，我第一反應(yīng)是：他對于軟件的貢獻(xiàn)，就像愛迪生之于燈泡。我相信，大多數(shù)的人都跟我一樣的看法，但，盡管如此，比爾?蓋茨究竟是一個怎樣的人，仍存在著各種爭議。

一方面：

他的身價曾經(jīng)達(dá)到過900億美元，一直都是全世界人民心中的“世界首富”；

他創(chuàng)造的微軟市場價值曾經(jīng)超過6000億美元，在很長一段時間內(nèi)都被稱為是全球最成功的公司；

在他的帶領(lǐng)下，微軟創(chuàng)造了曾經(jīng)全球最火的產(chǎn)品———Windows，幾乎每個人的生活、工作都離不開這款產(chǎn)品；

作為全球最成功企業(yè)的leader，他要同時對付產(chǎn)業(yè)、技術(shù)、法律、行政、華爾街等諸多問題，因此也被譽為擁有最強頭腦的人；

與此同時，他建立了世界上最大的慈善機構(gòu)，又對外宣布不會把遺產(chǎn)傳承給自己的兒女，而是全數(shù)投入慈善事業(yè)，因此他又被稱為是世界上最慷慨的慈善家；

此外他還擁有最好的運氣，一句話概況，他是地球上最成功的商人之一。

另一方面：

有人說他是世界上最貪婪的人———天天從股市里提款，還恨不得自己駕著F16戰(zhàn)斗機全世界打擊盜版；

有人說他是最無情的人———消費者已經(jīng)為一個Office產(chǎn)品給他支付了400多億美元，可還是漏洞百出；

有人說他是最兇狠的人———總是下意識地攻擊任何人、任何事；

有人說他是最虛偽的人———他的慈善舉措只是有史以來最昂貴的公關(guān)活動而已，為了收買民眾的好感。

而回顧比爾?蓋茨的成長經(jīng)歷，發(fā)現(xiàn)他為了達(dá)到某些目的可以不擇手段，也就是時下最常說的“心機婊”：

高中時，為獲得源代碼，蓋茨曾經(jīng)去翻垃圾箱；

為免費使用電腦，蓋茨和艾倫黑了C-Cubed公司會計文件；

高中時，蓋茨編寫排課程序?qū)⒆约号旁诹巳桥⒌陌嗉墸?/p>

因為沒趕上飛機，蓋茨曾劫持機場控制面板，并讓飛機返航。

比爾?蓋茨于2008年正式從微軟退休了，但是退休后的比爾?蓋茨也沒有閑著，繼續(xù)做著他喜歡做的事情并且都很有趣，比如：

投資避孕套，據(jù)說是新一代超薄避孕套，采用突破性材料，令其“非常非常薄”，感覺宛如皮膚，提升快感；

發(fā)起了“徹底改造馬桶”競賽，向8所知名大學(xué)的研究人員提供300萬美元，以重新設(shè)計瓷器“寶座”；

投資“人造雞蛋”，以雞蛋替代品做出餅干、糕點、蛋黃醬、蛋卷、吐司和煎蛋等蛋類相關(guān)食品，這項科技未來可能顛覆全球蛋類產(chǎn)業(yè)；

用繩命來支持Janicki OmniProcessor——能將人的排泄物過濾凈化成飲用水的機器，并在眾目睽睽之下，勇敢得喝掉了那杯“翔”。

就是這樣一個亦正亦邪、做事不擇手段、喜歡探索新生事物的人，創(chuàng)造了微軟，成就了軟件界的一個傳奇。記得我在上小學(xué)時，對美國、對電腦、對IT一點概念都沒有的時候，就知道了比爾?蓋茨這個人物，可見比爾?蓋茨在全球范圍內(nèi)的影響力相當(dāng)巨大。平時聽?wèi)T了國人對他的評價和膜拜，很好奇國外的民眾是如何評價比爾?蓋茨傳奇的一生以及他創(chuàng)造的微軟。我們一起來看看！

觀點一：

In almost every metric, Bill Gates was a great CEO:

1.He created tens of thousands of high paying jobs and is a hero among the developers at Microsoft, even now.

2.He built an excess of $200b for the stockholders and MSFT had one of the dream runs in stock market history (from 1980 to 1999).

3.He brought PC and computing to the common man, and without his push it is arguable that the computing world would be a much different place.

4.He is a great philanthropist who has contributed a lot both to Seattle's local community (through United Way & others) and to the broader world.

5.While the tech world hates him, you have to accept that he is the most well-known CEO in the world. Even in the developing world, a random guy would know who Bill Gates is without knowing anything about the US economy or technology.

6.If there were no Bill Gates but just Apple & IBM, it is less likely that the computing revolution would have entered the developing world. In countries such as India, we would have never been able to afford the Mac or a proprietary IBM box on a larger scale. That means we would have continued to stay in poverty with no hope.

He was good for workers, customers, shareholders and society at large.

不管從哪方面看，比爾·蓋茨都是一個偉大的CEO：

1、他創(chuàng)造了成千上萬個高薪的崗位，他是微軟所有開發(fā)者中最偉大的英雄，即使是現(xiàn)在；

2、他為股東創(chuàng)造了超$200B的財富，令微軟成為了股市歷史上難以逾越的神話（1980至1999年）；

3、他讓計算機在千家萬戶中普及，沒有他的推動，計算機和互聯(lián)網(wǎng)是否可以達(dá)到現(xiàn)如今的地位，值得商榷；

4、他是一個偉大的慈善家，他為西雅圖的當(dāng)?shù)厣鐓^(qū)以及世界其他各個角落的慈善事業(yè)都做出了卓越的貢獻(xiàn)；

5、盡管高科技屆有很多人恨他，但還是不得不承認(rèn)，他是世界上最知名的CEO。即使在發(fā)展中國家，大多數(shù)的人都知道比爾?蓋茨，就算他們對美國的經(jīng)濟(jì)或者技術(shù)一無所知；

6、如果沒有比爾?蓋茨，只有蘋果公司和IBM公司，計算機革命進(jìn)入發(fā)展中國家是不可能的。比如在印度，我們無法大規(guī)模地去普及蘋果和IBM的產(chǎn)品，這就意味著印度將繼續(xù)與貧困作戰(zhàn)，沒有希望。

綜上所述，比爾?蓋茨是一名優(yōu)秀的創(chuàng)造者、客戶、股東和社會公民。

觀點二：

The reasons I think Bill Gates was a good CEO are:

1. As a visionary founder, he had nothing to prove to anybody, and had a natural appetite for undertaking new, innovative ventures. He never thought anything was impossible for Microsoft. He had a clear vision for Microsoft and delivered it:- making technology accessible to everybody. Whether it be a PC for every desk, or making it more accessible for you to buy databases, the underly philosophy of Bill Gates as about access. (today it is about universal access to health care and education). He made Microsoft into a company that changed the world and brought mass computing to people and businesses. If you measure the total increase in business and personal productivity over last two decades, probably a lot comes thanks to MSFT, directly or indirectly.

2. He was clearly able to hire and retain good people who balanced out his vision with good organization skills and solid business skills. Visionary founders often fail here: being able to recognize what they are not good at, and entrusting other people with their "baby".

3. He planned and was discplined about succession. It is very hard to replace the energy and vision of a founder. It is impossible to know the outcomes before the benefit of hindsight, but by all measures, Ballmer was a great choice: he loved the company as much, was highly competent, knew every detail about MSFT businesses, is smart and energetic. I think the issue is not with who Bill chose as his successor, the issue is with how Ballmer could have dealt with the unforeseen rise of Google, Facebook, Salesforce, etc.

我覺得比爾?蓋茨是一個偉大的CEO，理由如下：

1、作為一個有遠(yuǎn)見的創(chuàng)始人，他沒有任何東西可以證明給大家，對新生事物充滿探索的熱情，是他唯一擁有的。他從沒想過對微軟來說有什么是不可能的。他對微軟有一個明確的愿景：讓技術(shù)造福每一個人。無論是作為一臺普通的計算機，或是用作數(shù)據(jù)庫，比爾·蓋茨的根本宗旨為連接這個世界。（現(xiàn)在是關(guān)于醫(yī)療保健和教育的普及）。他讓微軟進(jìn)入到每一個公司從而改變了世界。如果統(tǒng)計近二十年的企業(yè)和個人生產(chǎn)力的增加總量，我想，大部分的企業(yè)和個人都應(yīng)該感謝微軟，微軟直接或間接的影響力是巨大的。

2、他顯然能夠雇用并留住那些有良好組織能力和扎實業(yè)務(wù)技能的優(yōu)秀人才。但有遠(yuǎn)見的創(chuàng)始人往往會更加關(guān)注這個：能夠認(rèn)識到員工并不擅長的方面，并信任他們所擅長的。

3、對于繼任者，他非常重視并親自挑選，這對于一名創(chuàng)始人來說，是難以替代的能量和遠(yuǎn)見。在事情還沒發(fā)生之前去預(yù)測結(jié)果是很難的，但是縱觀所有的決策，Ballmer是一個很不錯的選擇：他非常熱愛公司，非常能干，熟知微軟的每一個細(xì)節(jié)，聰明，精力充沛。我覺得關(guān)鍵不在于比爾?蓋茨將選擇誰作為他的繼任者，而在于Ballmer如何應(yīng)對Google, Facebook, Salesforce這些公司不可預(yù)見的崛起。

觀點三：

Bill Gates and Steve Jobs are good analogues:brilliant, driven, broad in capacity for understanding and vision, with an inhuman capacity to consolidate information and lead. They both combined skillsets and personalities into one package that are only seen in rare intances across generations.

Anyone who had the pleasure of sitting in on one of the vaunted "BillG Reviews" back in the day knows what I mean. The Bill you see on TV is not the Bill that Microsoft saw behind closed doors. His energy, intellect, passion, ability to distill the most complex problems into basics in seconds while flinging a furious barrage of 'F' bombs, single handedly drove Microsoft until it could no longer, IMHO. Even Gates capacity couldn't scale to meet his model of success through micromanagement.

I personally feel he left because he knew this (and was likely burning out). Icontend it's a big part of the reason he won't come back - that and the Gates Foundation. He's got bigger fish to fry than worrying about a company that still makes lots of money.

比爾·蓋茨和史蒂夫·喬布斯有很多相似之處：卓越的能力、奮發(fā)努力、極強的理解力、有遠(yuǎn)見、有超出常人的獲取信息以及管理團(tuán)隊的能力。他們都是可以把技能和自己的性格特點結(jié)合在一起的人，這一點在歷史的河流中是極少見的。

任何一個以夸贊比爾?蓋茨的各種觀點為樂趣的人應(yīng)該懂我的意思。你在電視上看到的比爾?蓋茨并不是微軟公司所看到的那個“閉門造車”的比爾?蓋茨。他的能量、智慧、激情、能力以及瞬間將問題從復(fù)雜化為簡單的能力，讓他創(chuàng)造了微軟并靠他一個人的力量延續(xù)著這樣的神話，即使微軟的輝煌已不在（恕我直言），即使現(xiàn)在比爾?蓋茨已經(jīng)離開了微軟，無法再續(xù)寫他的成功傳奇。

微軟輝煌已不在，我個人覺得他之所以會離開微軟，是因為他深知這一點。蓋茨基金會也是他不會再回來的另一大原因。比起擔(dān)心一個公司的運營，他還有更重要、更偉大的事去做，而且這件事仍舊可以讓他賺很多錢。

觀點四：

Being from a completely non IT field. I'll take this one task of trying to answer this.

Bill Gates a good CEO for Microsoft

Why?

Look around and notice how the world has paced in the last few decades.Great engineering , Infrastructures, Fast cars,Modern Aircraft's carrying up to 850 passengers in its belly. All this happened in the last 3-4 decades. WOW!!!! Miss something in this? Something commonly referred to as a mobile phone revolution in the last decade.

Along with that came something very exciting , an IT revolution triggering millions of jobs worldwide.

Sure today we have Android dominating the mobile market and iOS followed next.The Stock price of Apple ever mounting,Google’s balance sheets increasing in sizable numbers year on year basis.Facebook and n number of successful start ups have led to this revolution in the IT industry and slowly moving in to the mobile industry.

All this said and written,We need to understand what was the driving force behind this revolution.

This Man started all this.

The reason we were able to move from

To this a little more than a decade later

And more recently to this

The single answer to this revolution is Microsoft led by Bill Gates.

Had there be no microsoft in the world or more specifically Windows in the world , we might still be either stuck with those giant IBM machines or those exsorbidantly priced Macintosh.

Performance of Microsoft when Bill Gates was the CEO.

In late 1999 Microsoft’s valuation reached some dizzying heights. And that was 15 years ago. On Dec. 27, 1999 Microsoft’s valuation hit an all-time record of more than $613 billion. In today’s dollars that would be more than $873 billion.

Yes those figures are correct, imagine how many fortunes were made simply because of this, How many jobs were created by this Software Giant!

All this under the vision of Bill Gates.

An un matched monopoly in the PC industry, Apple until late 2008 did not even more than 3% share in the global PC market. To create a product is one thing ,to sustain the company against it’s rival is another and to dominate the world with your product deserves a salute.

Bill gates was one of the greatest visionaries the world has ever seen and would ever see for a long long time.The amount of innovation given by Microsoft under his leadership is matchless during the 90’s.The amount of wealth created by Microsoft at it’s peak in 1999 is yet to matched by Apple(if we take inflation into account). Without Bill Gates the entire PC industry would not have been the same,He bought PC’s to the developing nations at a pace that no corporation could match.

All this when Bill Gates was the top boss at the Microsoft Headquarters.Could Microsoft had got a better CEO than him? NO Chance.

作為一個非IT行業(yè)的人，我覺得比爾?蓋茨對微軟來說，是一個偉大的CEO，為什么？

回顧下歷史，過去的幾十年這個世界是以何種方式往前踱步的。偉大的工程、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施、跑車、已經(jīng)可以運載850名乘客的現(xiàn)代飛機。所有的這些都發(fā)生在過去的30-40年。哇！?。∵z漏了某些事？過去的十年間，還發(fā)生了一項重大革命，那就是移動電話的產(chǎn)生和普及。

除了這些，還有一個更令人興奮的重大事件——一場造就了全世界范圍內(nèi)數(shù)百萬個就業(yè)崗位的IT革命。

如今，在移動電話市場，我們擁有了安卓和緊接著而來的IOS。蘋果的股票價格一直在增長，谷歌的資產(chǎn)也在以超快的增長速度逐年增長。Facebook以及其他一大群成功的企業(yè)引領(lǐng)了這場IT革命，并且這場革命的影響力正逐漸轉(zhuǎn)移到移動互聯(lián)網(wǎng)行業(yè)。

但是，我們必須要明白到底是誰開創(chuàng)了這一項革命。

就是這個男人。

理由有如下這些

還有這個

和這個

毫無疑問，由比爾?蓋茨帶領(lǐng)的微軟開創(chuàng)了這一項革命。如果沒有微軟，或許我們現(xiàn)在只能用著那些巨大無比的IBM機器或者價格昂貴無比的計算機。

比爾?蓋茨擔(dān)任微軟CEO期間，微軟的成就：

1999年底微軟的估值達(dá)到了一些令人目眩的高度，注意這是15年前。在1999年12月27日，微軟的估值創(chuàng)下超過$6130億的空前紀(jì)錄。如果換算到現(xiàn)在，將超過$8730億。

對，這些數(shù)字都是正確的，想象下，多少人的命運因此得到了改變，這個軟件巨頭又因此為這個世界創(chuàng)造了多少工作機會。

所有的一切都是因為比爾?蓋茨。

在PC行業(yè)，從來都沒有過這樣的壟斷，即使是蘋果，直到2008年，在全球的PC市場甚至沒有超過3%的份額。要創(chuàng)建一個產(chǎn)品是一回事，而打敗競爭對手一直延續(xù)成功的神話是另一回事。更重要的是，一個改變了這個世界的產(chǎn)品值得致敬。

比爾·蓋茨是世界上有史以來最偉大的夢想家之一，并且在未來很長很長一段時間內(nèi)無人能超越。在90年代，比爾?蓋茨領(lǐng)導(dǎo)下的微軟做出的革新是其他公司都無法比擬的。微軟在它的高峰期1999年創(chuàng)造的財富可以與現(xiàn)如今的蘋果所創(chuàng)造的的財富一較高下（如果我們考慮到通貨膨脹）。如果沒有比爾?蓋茨，PC產(chǎn)業(yè)就沒有如今的輝煌，他將PC帶入了發(fā)展中國家，這一點沒有人可以與他相提并論。

所有的一切都是在比爾?蓋茨擔(dān)任微軟最高領(lǐng)導(dǎo)期間發(fā)生的。微軟還有可能出現(xiàn)一個比他更好的CEO嗎？肯定不可能。

觀點五：

A good rule of thumb is that anytime someone builds one of the most valuable companies of all time during their tenure as CEO, he or she was a good CEO.

一個好的經(jīng)驗法則是，不管在什么時候，不管是誰，在其任職CEO的期間創(chuàng)造了這個世界上最有價值的公司之一，他或者她就是一個好的CEO。

觀點六：

Microsoft has been criticized for a long time for trying to kill the competition and also the open source community.

Windows is not open source but at least its not as restrictive as Mac OS or the "new" Windows is.

You can pretty much change the whole user interface of windows with the give APIs without knowing the source code.

Also that it also gives the freedom to save costs by going for a budget hardware or going for a PC of the brand you trust or the colour you want etc.

If I am a software engineer now and I can probably afford a mac or understand what computer is, its all because of the affordable Windows PC I used in my childhood.

If windows was not there, Apple would have eaten the personal computing world and everyone would be locked into its control.

All the credit goes to Bill Gates for this.

The guy basically told the world that Software is a separate entity and can be soldindependent of the hardware.

All Software engineers owe one to him, even if they hate him!

In Smartphone era, Apple did the same with iOS and but Windows joined the party very late.

but thank god Android came in and basically did the same thing or much more than what Windows did with PC.

gave people choice of hardware and price and that's what a common man wants. :)

微軟對于競爭者及開放資源的扼殺一直被批評了很長時間。

windows雖然不是開放的資源，但至少，它沒有Mac OS的限制性，也不像“新的”windows那樣。

你可以在不知道源代碼的情況下改變應(yīng)用程序的界面。

同時，不管你是要買一個在自己預(yù)算中的硬件或是一臺你信得過的牌子旗下的電腦亦或是你想要的顏色，它都可以給你很多空間去節(jié)省成本。

如果我是一名軟件工程師，現(xiàn)在我也許可以承受Mac或了解電腦的所有，因為價格實惠的Windows PC代表著我的童年。

如果Windows不存在，那么蘋果將成為電腦領(lǐng)域的統(tǒng)治者，每個人都將被其控制。

這一切全都?xì)w功于比爾?蓋茨。

這家伙基本上是告訴世人，軟件是一個獨立的實體，可以獨立于硬件出售。

所有的軟件工程師都欠他一個人情，即使他們恨他。

在智能手機時代，蘋果用IOS做了同樣的事情，可惜Windows入局太晚。

但是要感謝Android的出現(xiàn)，基本上做了與微軟同樣的事情，甚至比微軟做得更多：給了人們選擇硬件和價格的機會，這正是一個普通人想要的東西。:)

觀點七：

This is an astonishing question. Bill Gates made Microsoft. Microsoft didn't magically spring out of Zeus's head and find Bill Gates in the freezer section of CEO-Mart.

這是一個異乎尋常的問題。比爾?蓋茨創(chuàng)造了微軟。微軟并沒有奇跡般地從宙斯的腦袋里涌現(xiàn)出來，也沒有發(fā)現(xiàn)比爾?蓋茨“總裁超市”里的“冷柜部分”。

觀點八：

A better question is, was there ever a period of a whole month when Bill Gates was a bad CEO?

一個更好的問題是，請問在哪段時間里，比爾?蓋茨是一個不好的CEO？

觀點九：

When I started my Microsoft career about 5 years back, Gates was long gone (address list listed him as a non-executive chairman when I searched on my first day), but there is something I noticed. Almost all the MS veterans I met spoke highly of him. They still does and they have their reasons.

To answer the question; in simple words, a company's enormous success when he was leading it will tell you how good a CEO was. If you dig deep, you'll be able to find a hundred reasons to say otherwise but hey, look at the company now, or, look at the desktops/laptops you see around. He has a significant hand in putting it all out there and making our lives easier.

當(dāng)我開始我的微軟生涯時，他已經(jīng)離開微軟了。但有件事我注意到了，幾乎所有我認(rèn)識的微軟的高層對他的評價都很高。而且他們依舊在這樣做，因為他們有他們的原因。

要回答這個問題：簡單的說，在他的帶領(lǐng)下，一個公司獲得了巨大的成功，而這樣的成功正可以向你證明這個ceo有多偉大。如果深挖，你有一百個理由，比如，你看看你周圍的臺式機或者筆記本電腦，他們就是最好的例子，他們讓我們的生活變得更容易。

觀點十：

I would argue that Bill Gates did an excellent job during the 80's and first part of the 90's, and an awful job from then on, leaving Steve Ballmer with one heck of a mess, including a terrible antitrust battle against the USA and EU (something which Intel largely avoided). Ballmer did a good job initially cleaning up Bill Gates' antitrust messes, and focusing the company on its key product lines, but failed to lead the company to catch up with a very fast moving industry. Both deserve a lot of blame for Microsoft's current poor strategic position and disastrous execution (such as Vista) -- being too tied to legacy businesses and not able to embrace the transition from PC generation to Internet.

我認(rèn)為在80年代和90年代前半部分，比爾·蓋茨的工作很出色，但也從那時起他的工作變得更“可怕”，它讓史蒂夫·鮑爾默陷入了一堆亂局之中，包括對美國和歐盟的一個可怕的反壟斷戰(zhàn)役（英特爾在很大程度上避免了這個戰(zhàn)役）。鮑爾默的工作做得很好，初步清理了比爾·蓋茨的反壟斷混亂，并著眼于公司最主要的產(chǎn)品線，但未能帶領(lǐng)公司趕上這個快速發(fā)展的行業(yè)。微軟目前不佳的戰(zhàn)略地位和災(zāi)難性的執(zhí)行力，雙方都有責(zé)任——太依賴傳統(tǒng)業(yè)務(wù)，而沒有適應(yīng)從PC到移動互聯(lián)網(wǎng)的過渡。

總結(jié)：

無可厚非，比爾?蓋茨和他的微軟改變了這個世界，沒有人可以否定他的價值。不管是國內(nèi)國外，在民眾的眼里，他都是神一般的存在，而那些個爭議的背后也許都是赤裸裸的嫉妒吧！這個世界就像是一個劇場，每個人都在里面扮演著屬于自己的角色，相比我們這些普通人，比爾?蓋茨所扮演的角色更重要戲份更多。但是，當(dāng)人站在了一定的高度，得到了無數(shù)掌聲和鮮花的同時，也會伴隨無數(shù)的爭議。人非圣賢，孰能無過，不管比爾?蓋茨是不是一個心機婊，他的確是成功了，而且是前無古人后無來者的成功，他將被永遠(yuǎn)載入史冊?；蛟S他本人也根本不會在意這些個爭議，不管外界如何評論他，他非常非常非常有錢這一個事實，是無法改變的。這是個“我有錢我就牛逼”的時代，毫無疑問！