背景
?公司某貸業(yè)務(wù)線同學(xué)某天在針對(duì)aop方法進(jìn)行單測(cè)的時(shí)候遇到問(wèn)題然后有幸?guī)兔σ黄鹋挪閱?wèn)題,報(bào)錯(cuò)的信息翻譯過(guò)來(lái)就是在spring上下文中找不到指定類型的類對(duì)象,具體錯(cuò)誤信息如下。
Caused by: org.springframework.beans.factory.NoSuchBeanDefinitionException:
No qualifying bean of type [service.biz.sale.impl.PtXxxCoreServiceImpl] found for dependency:
expected at least 1 bean which qualifies as autowire candidate for this dependency.
Dependency annotations: {@javax.annotation.Resource(shareable=true, lookup=, name=,
description=, authenticationType=CONTAINER, type=class java.lang.Object, mappedName=)}
at factory.support.DefaultListableBeanFactory.raiseNoSuchBeanDefinitionException(DefaultListableBeanFactory.java:1326)
at factory.support.DefaultListableBeanFactory.doResolveDependency(DefaultListableBeanFactory.java:1072)
at factory.support.DefaultListableBeanFactory.resolveDependency(DefaultListableBeanFactory.java:967)
?額外信息就是在針對(duì)某類增加aop前是沒(méi)有問(wèn)題,但是增加aop之后就會(huì)報(bào)如上錯(cuò)誤,所以基本上第一反應(yīng)就是aop影響了程序的正常啟動(dòng),只是具體原因不確定而已。
應(yīng)用分析
類的具體實(shí)現(xiàn)方式
該類是需要進(jìn)行單測(cè)的類,該類的某方法被aop進(jìn)行了修飾。
PtXxxCoreServiceImpl的父類BaseSaleXxxService實(shí)現(xiàn)了接口BizSaleXxxService。
PtXxxCoreServiceImpl繼承自BaseSaleXxxService間接實(shí)現(xiàn)接口。
public abstract class BaseSaleXxxService implements BizSaleXxxService { }
public class PtXxxCoreServiceImpl extends BaseSaleXxxService { }
類的單測(cè)代碼
單測(cè)的代碼,通過(guò)在xxxServiceFactory.getCoreService()在spring上線文獲取PtSaleCoreServiceImpl對(duì)象。
針對(duì)該對(duì)象的updateXxxCredit進(jìn)行單測(cè),updateXxxCredit方法通過(guò)aop進(jìn)行切面。
xxxServiceFactory.getCoreService(XxxChannelEnum.PT.getChannel())獲取PtXxxCoreServiceImpl類型對(duì)象。
獲取PtXxxCoreServiceImpl類型對(duì)象報(bào)No qualifying bean of type [PtXxxCoreServiceImpl] found for dependency錯(cuò)誤。
public void testUpdateXXXCredit() throws Exception {
try {
xxxServiceFactory.getCoreService(
XxxChannelEnum.PT.getChannel()).updateXxxCredit(111701210L,
"200", DateUtil.getNowTimeInSec(),
SaleCreditXxxStatusEnum.SUCCESS.getCode());
} catch (Exception e) {
throw e;
}
}
AOP的代碼
- 對(duì)PtXxxCoreServiceImpl進(jìn)行了切面操作生成的代理的對(duì)象不再是PtXxxCoreServiceImpl。
- 由于PtXxxCoreServiceImpl實(shí)現(xiàn)了BizSaleXxxService,猜測(cè)最后的代理的對(duì)象應(yīng)該是BizSaleXxxService類型。
@Aspect
public class MonitorXxxService {
@Before(value = "execution(* service.biz.sale.impl.PtXxxCoreServiceImpl.updateXxxCredit(..))")
public void salePtCreditMarvin(JoinPoint point) {
}
}
原因分析
- PtXxxCoreServiceImpl類實(shí)現(xiàn)某個(gè)接口(implements xxxInterface)導(dǎo)致走JDK的代理實(shí)現(xiàn)方式。
- PtXxxCoreServiceImpl的代理對(duì)象類型不再是PtXxxCoreServiceImpl,個(gè)人猜測(cè)為接口xxxInterface類型。
- 通過(guò)JDK生成的代理的類型和類PtXxxCoreServiceImpl不匹配導(dǎo)致報(bào)錯(cuò)該類型的對(duì)象找不到報(bào)錯(cuò)。
spring官網(wǎng)有一段話解釋Spring AOP的具體兩種實(shí)現(xiàn)以及何時(shí)用何種代理實(shí)現(xiàn)。
- 如果代理對(duì)象的類實(shí)現(xiàn)了至少一個(gè)接口(implements interface),那么JDK代理方式會(huì)被使用。
- 如果代理對(duì)象的類沒(méi)有實(shí)現(xiàn)任何接口(implements interface),那么CGLIB代理方式會(huì)被使用。
- 如果你想強(qiáng)制使用CGLIB方式實(shí)現(xiàn)代理,設(shè)置 <aop:config> 標(biāo)簽的proxy-target-class屬性為true即可。
Spring AOP uses either JDK dynamic proxies or CGLIB to create the proxy for a given target object.
(JDK dynamic proxies are preferred whenever you have a choice).
If the target object to be proxied implements at least one interface then a JDK dynamic proxy will be used.
All of the interfaces implemented by the target type will be proxied.
If the target object does not implement any interfaces then a CGLIB proxy will be created.
If you want to force the use of CGLIB proxying, set the value of the
proxy-target-class attribute of the <aop:config> element to true
<aop:aspectj-autoproxy proxy-target-class="true"/>
解決方案
- 設(shè)置<aop:aspectj-autoproxy proxy-target-class="true"/>使全局都走CGLIB代理方式。