A10598-Day9

Example1:

Premise:A mind that can be rehabilitated is not a true criminal mind.

Conclusion:A truly criminal mind cannot be rehabilitated.

Attack:This logical fallacy is begging the question. It defines what “a true criminalmind” is, and then uses this definition to support the conclusion.



Example2:

Premise:One passage in the Bible says “all Scripture is given by inspiration of God”.

Conclusion:The Bible is the inspired word of God.

Attack:This argument is arguing in a circle. The conclusion that “The Bible is theinspired word of God.” is based on the premise that one passage in the Biblesays “all Scripture is given by inspiration of God”. There is no other evidencethat can support the conclusion.

?著作權(quán)歸作者所有,轉(zhuǎn)載或內(nèi)容合作請(qǐng)聯(lián)系作者
【社區(qū)內(nèi)容提示】社區(qū)部分內(nèi)容疑似由AI輔助生成，瀏覽時(shí)請(qǐng)結(jié)合常識(shí)與多方信息審慎甄別。
平臺(tái)聲明：文章內(nèi)容（如有圖片或視頻亦包括在內(nèi)）由作者上傳并發(fā)布，文章內(nèi)容僅代表作者本人觀點(diǎn)，簡(jiǎn)書系信息發(fā)布平臺(tái)，僅提供信息存儲(chǔ)服務(wù)。

相關(guān)閱讀更多精彩內(nèi)容

友情鏈接更多精彩內(nèi)容